1 min read

ShotSpotter? More Like ShotWrong—But Cops Keep Using It Anyway

ShotSpotter? More Like ShotWrong—But Cops Keep Using It Anyway
Photo by Michael Förtsch / Unsplash

TL;DR: Cities spend millions deploying ShotSpotter to detect gunshots. Nearly 70% of alerts are false alarms—often triggered by fireworks, trash trucks, or construction. Meanwhile over-policed communities, especially Black and Brown neighborhoods, see increased police presence, not safety. And nobody demands change.


The Data Doesn’t Lie

  • Boston records show nearly 70% of alerts produced no evidence of gunfire, and 16% were clearly fireworks or other noises.
  • Chicago saw over 50,000 alerts in 2021, but fewer than 10% involved actual shootings.
  • Cities continue contracts because they can blame crime tech instead of policing policy.

The Impact is Real (Mostly Negative)

  • Police launch raids where no crime happened.
  • Residents experience terror instead of protection.
  • Politicians brag about public safety spending while ignoring harms.

TL;DR

  • ShotSpotter is expensive, inaccurate, and punitive.
  • Designed for surveillance, not safety.
  • Deployed disproportionately in minority communities.
  • No transparency. No accountability.

Posted by someone who hears more alarms than actual violence.