ShotSpotter? More Like ShotWrong—But Cops Keep Using It Anyway
TL;DR: Cities spend millions deploying ShotSpotter to detect gunshots. Nearly 70% of alerts are false alarms—often triggered by fireworks, trash trucks, or construction. Meanwhile over-policed communities, especially Black and Brown neighborhoods, see increased police presence, not safety. And nobody demands change.
The Data Doesn’t Lie
- Boston records show nearly 70% of alerts produced no evidence of gunfire, and 16% were clearly fireworks or other noises.
- Chicago saw over 50,000 alerts in 2021, but fewer than 10% involved actual shootings.
- Cities continue contracts because they can blame crime tech instead of policing policy.
The Impact is Real (Mostly Negative)
- Police launch raids where no crime happened.
- Residents experience terror instead of protection.
- Politicians brag about public safety spending while ignoring harms.
TL;DR
- ShotSpotter is expensive, inaccurate, and punitive.
- Designed for surveillance, not safety.
- Deployed disproportionately in minority communities.
- No transparency. No accountability.
—
Posted by someone who hears more alarms than actual violence.
Member discussion